Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1008182 Cities 2016 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Methods of land bank property disposition differ even in similar markets.•Misalignments of land banks and community land trusts need to be rectified.•Established CLTs could perform well even in distressed neighborhoods.•The government needs to show a clear future perspective to each community.

The importance of both land banks and community land trusts is increasing, and the two organizations are complementary. In distressed neighborhoods, land banks and community land trusts share the same roles as providers and stewards of affordable housing. However, contact points between land banks and community land trusts are currently scarce. This paper analyzes various combinations of land banks and community land trusts in both weak markets and stable markets. When a misalignment of land banks and community land trusts occurs, business models of land banks and community land trusts as well as public policies need to be adjusted. Utilization of community land trusts is an option to add on the disposition of land banks properties because community land trusts have a potential to create perpetual and diverse communities. In order for community-based organizations including community land trusts to grow in depopulated cities, the government needs to show a clear future perspective to each community.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Business, Management and Accounting Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
Authors
,