Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1014871 European Management Journal 2014 12 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Analysing ambidexterity at a sub-organisational level within specific projects.•Deriving indicators for grasping formalisation and flexibilisation in innovation.•Combining insights from debate on ambidexterity and organisational studies.•Empirical in-depth illustration of practical coping with the outlined tension.

A classic problem in organising corporate innovation projects is the tension between formalisation and flexibilisation. Connecting this discussion to the younger debate on ambidexterity, this paper asks how organisations balance informal and formal, flexible and inflexible ways of working in their innovation projects. It derives a way to break down formalisation and flexibilisation into the dimensions of power, communication and trust and connects them to learning. By unhinging formalisation and flexibilisation from the organisational level and looking at them at the small-scale level of specific projects and functional arenas instead, the paper sheds new light onto the various fashions in which formalisation and flexibilisation do not contradict, but complement each other. An empirical account based on 100 qualitative expert interviews illustrates this.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Business, Management and Accounting Business and International Management
Authors
,