Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1014888 European Management Journal 2012 15 Pages PDF
Abstract

SummaryThis article addresses coordination practices in extreme situations. Whereas past literature has heavily focused on a structural and contingent approach of the phenomena, we argue that a practice-based approach of coordination fruitfully enhances our understanding. We draw on an abductive approach and perform a systematic comparative analysis of four case studies: the crew of a sailing boat engaged in a race, military air and ground forces in theater, medical staff in a neonatology unit and a polar expedition confronted with polar bears. We outline highly heterogeneous coordination practices along four dimensions (formalization, verticality, openness, and specificity). Our results lead to invalidate both a configurational and a contingent perspective on coordination. We show that despite high heterogeneity, these four attributes represent a useful framework for managers to leverage coordination practices produced in situ.

► The article addresses coordination practices in extreme situations. ► We perform a systematic comparative analysis of four extreme case studies. ► We outline heterogeneous coordination practices along four dimensions: formalization, verticality, openness, specificity. ► The results lead to invalidate both a configurational and a contingent perspective on coordination. ► We show that four attributes represent a useful framework for managers to leverage coordination practices produced in situ.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Business, Management and Accounting Business and International Management
Authors
, , , , , ,