Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1014940 | European Management Journal | 2013 | 14 Pages |
SummaryThis paper addresses the dearth of research into material artifacts and how they are engaged in strategizing activities. Building on the strategy-as-practice perspective, and the notion of epistemic objects, we develop a typology of strategy practices that show how managers use material artifacts to strategize by a dual process of knowledge abstraction and substitution. Empirically, we study the practice of underwriting managers in reinsurance companies. Our findings first identify the artifacts – pictures, maps, data packs, spreadsheets and graphs – that these managers use to appraise reinsurance deals. Second, the analysis of each artifact’s situated use led to the identification of five practices for doing strategy with artifacts: physicalizing, locating, enumerating, analyzing, and selecting. Last, we developed a typology that shows how practices vary in terms of their level of abstraction from the physical properties of the risk being reinsured and unfold through a process of substituting. Our conceptual framework extends existing work in the strategy-as-practice field that calls for research into the role of material artifacts.
► Our conceptual framework extends existing work in the strategy-as-practice. ► It offers a typology of artifacts and their situated uses in doing strategy work. ► It shows strategizing as a dual process of knowledge abstraction and substitution.