Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10151519 | Applied Ergonomics | 2019 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
The impact of using a smartwatch to initiate phone calls on driver workload, attention, and performance was compared to smartphone visual-manual (VM) and auditory-vocal (AV) interfaces. In a driving simulator, 36 participants placed calls using each method. While task time and number of glances were greater for AV calling on the smartwatch vs. smartphone, remote detection task (R-DRT) responsiveness, mean single glance duration, percentage of long duration off-road glances, total off-road glance time, and percent time looking off-road were similar; the later metrics were all significantly higher for the VM interface vs. AV methods. Heart rate and skin conductance were higher during phone calling tasks than “just driving”, but did not consistently differentiate calling method. Participants exhibited more erratic driving behavior (lane position and major steering wheel reversals) for smartphone VM calling compared to both AV methods. Workload ratings were lower for AV calling on both devices vs. VM calling.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Computer Science
Human-Computer Interaction
Authors
David Perlman, Aubrey Samost, August G. Domel, Bruce Mehler, Jonathan Dobres, Bryan Reimer,