Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1017772 | Journal of Business Research | 2012 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
We advance, and test, two competing hypotheses that relate prior non-profit experience to mismanagement and/or negligence against the null of no relationship. The evidence supports the hypothesis that the bureaucratic and chaotic culture of many non-profits often attracts and/or molds individuals with subpar managerial habits. We find that firms headed by CEOs with non-profit experience are more likely to restate financial statements than other firms, even after controlling for variables that have been shown to affect restatements, and that the returns around announcements of class action securities litigation are more negative for firms with “non-profit” CEOs.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Business and International Management
Authors
Stanley Peterburgsky,