Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1021904 | Technovation | 2014 | 14 Pages |
•Knowledge sharing is widely analysed but limited research has been conducted in co-development of new products with suppliers.•Knowledge sharing activity and intensity depends on supplier configurations (black, grey and white box).•The dynamics of knowledge sharing is analysed through Carlile׳s framework (knowledge transfer, translation and transformation).•For Black Box projects, knowledge translation is a prerequisite for knowledge transfer and then knowledge transformation.•For Grey Box projects, knowledge transfer and translation are initiated simultaneously in a continuous loop.•For White Box projects, knowledge transfer is the key activity and potentially generates knowledge translation.
Managing supplier collaboration is increasingly cited as a key success factor in new product development (NPD) performance. Knowledge sharing between customer and supplier is a critical issue to manage collaboration but one which has only been partially investigated in the inter-organisational NPD context. This means that the specific characteristics of knowledge sharing according to the three classical supplier involvement configurations (black box: design is supplier driver, grey box: joint design and white box: design is customer driven) are still largely unknown. This research proposes to fill this gap by presenting a conceptual framework for knowledge sharing according to the supplier involvement configuration. Knowledge sharing integrates knowledge transfer, translation and transformation. A qualitative methodology based on cross-case comparisons of six projects in two companies is used. This research shows that the dynamics of knowledge sharing depend on each configuration. Thus, for black box projects, knowledge translation is a prerequisite for knowledge transfer. For grey box projects, knowledge transfer and translation are initiated simultaneously in a continuous loop. For white box projects, knowledge transfer is the key activity and potentially generates knowledge translation. The results suggest that managers should pay attention to translation activities which are critical for the success of co-development projects.