Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1027484 Industrial Marketing Management 2015 15 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Develops a theoretical link between supplier's marketing accountability and customer's perceived value•Aligns marketing accountability with a resource-based view and distinctive capabilities concept•Presents a bibliometric co-citation analysis for the marketing accountability field•Proposes marketing accountability dimensions: marketing metrics, firm capabilities and marketing manager's competence•Uses cross-case comparisons in qualitative analysis of marketing accountability and customer perceived value

This paper explores where and how marketing accountability of a supplier meets customer perceived value in a business relationship setting. If the supplier's firm implements marketing accountability processes, marketing activities are improved, as well as the communication of the value proposition to customers. The supplier's value proposition is in turn reflected through the creation of superior customer perceived value, which triggers attitudinal and behavioral value outcomes. Hence, the marketing accountability of the supplier, through its external manifestation with customers, ultimately influences the supplier's financial results. The aim of the paper is to discuss the external effect of marketing accountability in a business relationship context, which is often suppressed by the prevailing focus on the internal manifestations of marketing accountability, or the inside-out approach. As marketing accountability is an evolving field, bibliometric co-citation analysis is carried out to gain a better understanding of the marketing accountability's domain and scope. On the grounds of the relationship marketing theory and resource-based view, qualitative research was carried out and insights from interviews with marketing managers from different industries were analyzed. The paper concludes by suggesting the operationalization of the marketing accountability construct and pointing out the need for a multilevel and dyadic design of further empirical studies for testing the proposed external effect of marketing accountability.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Business, Management and Accounting Marketing
Authors
, ,