Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1027602 | Industrial Marketing Management | 2012 | 10 Pages |
Why do key accounts combine opposing types of relationship with their suppliers? The author has chosen to term this new hybrid form of supplier relationship management, which combines cooperation and price-competitive transactions and reflects the tension between value creation and value appropriation, “vertical coopetition.” She investigates the use of this concept in the context of an in-depth qualitative study, involving, firstly, an exploratory field study and, secondly, four case studies involving leading industrial MNCs. The results indicate that “vertical coopetition” occurs in two forms: when the price-competitive approach is predominant but some cooperation features are still to be found; and when cooperation is predominant, but appeals to competition are still made. Mutually opposed aspects of each form are linked and explained by three pivotal mechanisms, which the author calls, “strengthening”, “correction” and “commuting”. Finally, the study reveals that, increasingly, the key account's brands or Business Unit value1 are explanatory forces of “vertical coopetition”.
► Key accounts combine cooperation and price-competitive transactions with their suppliers. ► This study shows that three pivotal mechanisms link two opposite forms of relationships and create “vertical coopetition”. ► Not only purchased products, but also key accounts' own brand values are explanatory forces of “vertical coopetition”.