Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10322655 | Expert Systems with Applications | 2011 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
⺠Feature selections using Type-I metrics (ÏP2 and Gini index) achieve the comparable classification performances with those of the combination framework using Type-III metrics (signed Ï2 and signed information gain). ⺠The performances with Type-II metrics (Ï2 and information gain) are significantly degraded with increasing the degree of class imbalance. ⺠Type-III metrics produced the best performance; however, the optimization with these metrics is not easy in real applications. ⺠Type-I metrics serve as more simplified alternative methods for the combination framework. ⺠The classification performances using Type-I and Type-II metrics have positive correlations with the number of negative features.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Computer Science
Artificial Intelligence
Authors
Hiroshi Ogura, Hiromi Amano, Masato Kondo,