Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
10344523 Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2015 15 Pages PDF
Abstract
The relative overlap of identified lesions decreased by 5.91% in case of Rigid registration, 6.23% in case of Affine registration, 4.48% for Demons registration, whereas it increased by 3.05% in case of B-Splines registration. Rigid and Affine transformation-based registration took only 0.1936 and 0.2893 s per frame, respectively. Demons and B-Splines framework took only 0.5705 and 0.9405 s per frame, respectively, which were significantly slower than Rigid and Affine transformation based image registration.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Computer Science Computer Science (General)
Authors
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,