| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10355138 | Healthcare | 2015 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
/Implementation Lessons
- Engaging stakeholders in the research process has the potential to improve quality of care and the patient care experience.
- Online patient community surveys can elicit important topic areas for comparative effectiveness research.
- Stakeholder meetings with substantial patient representation, as well as representation from health care delivery systems and research funding agencies, are a valuable tool for selecting and refining pilot research and quality improvement projects.
- Giving patient stakeholders a deciding vote in selecting pilot research topics helps ensure their 'voice' is heard.
- Researchers and health care leaders should continue to develop best-practices and strategies for increasing patient involvement in comparative effectiveness and delivery science research.
- Engaging stakeholders in the research process has the potential to improve quality of care and the patient care experience.
- Online patient community surveys can elicit important topic areas for comparative effectiveness research.
- Stakeholder meetings with substantial patient representation, as well as representation from health care delivery systems and research funding agencies, are a valuable tool for selecting and refining pilot research and quality improvement projects.
- Giving patient stakeholders a deciding vote in selecting pilot research topics helps ensure their 'voice' is heard.
- Researchers and health care leaders should continue to develop best-practices and strategies for increasing patient involvement in comparative effectiveness and delivery science research.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Computer Science
Computer Science Applications
Authors
Julie A. Schmittdiel, Jay Desai, Emily B. Schroeder, Andrea R. Paolino, Gregory A. Nichols, Jean M. Lawrence, Patrick J. O'Connor, Kris A. Ohnsorg, Katherine M. Newton, John F. Steiner,