Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10362197 | Pattern Recognition Letters | 2005 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
In semiconductor manufacturing, the spatial pattern of failed devices in a wafer can give precious hints on which step of the process is responsible for the failures. In the literature, Kohonen's Self Organizing Feature Maps (SOM) and Adaptive Resonance Theory 1 (ART1) architectures have been compared, concluding that the latter are to be preferred. However, both the simulated and the real data sets used for validation and comparison were very limited. In this paper, the use of ART1 and SOM as wafer classifiers is re-assessed on much more extensive simulated and real data sets. We conclude that ART1 is not adequate, whereas SOM provide completely satisfactory results including visually effective representation of spatial failure probability of the pattern classes.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Computer Science
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Authors
F. Di Palma, G. De Nicolao, G. Miraglia, E. Pasquinetti, F. Piccinini,