| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10513499 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2015 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
The reporting of harms in gastroenterology systematic reviews is largely inadequate and highly asymmetrical compared with the reporting of benefits. We suggest that review authors routinely assess both efficacy and harms outcomes of an intervention and that reporting guidelines specifically targeting harms reporting be developed.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Suzanne E. Mahady, Timothy Schlub, Lisa Bero, David Moher, David Tovey, Jacob George, Jonathan C. Craig,