Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10513675 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2013 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Groups within The Cochrane Collaboration currently use a range of different priority-setting systems, some of which are more detailed than others. These differences often reflect the nature of The Cochrane Collaboration itself: given the topic breadth, history, and variety of international contexts present in the organization, a single unified system would not always be appropriate. All Cochrane entities, however, should have or develop strategic plans to improve the inclusiveness and transparency of their own prioritization processes, increase the number of finished prioritized reviews, and make more effective use of feedback from end users to increase the likelihood of producing reviews that have positive effects on health outcomes.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Mona Nasser, Vivian Welch, Peter Tugwell, Erin Ueffing, Jodie Doyle, Elizabeth Waters,