Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
10631347 Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 2005 12 Pages PDF
Abstract
Arguments in favor of the electric modulus formalism are reviewed, and several misunderstandings and misrepresentations are corrected. It is argued that different representations of the same experimental data provide additional, rather then subtractive, insights into the difficult problem of understanding ionic conductivity in melts, glasses and crystals.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Materials Science Ceramics and Composites
Authors
, , ,