Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10826053 | Methods | 2010 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
There are numerous approaches to decipher a whole genome DNA methylation profile (“methylome”), each varying in cost, throughput and resolution. The gold standard of these methods, whole genome bisulfite-sequencing (BS-seq), involves treatment of DNA with sodium bisulfite combined with subsequent high throughput sequencing. Using BS-seq, we generated a single-base-resolution methylome in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (in press). This BS-seq map was then used as the reference methylome to compare two alternative sequencing-based methylome assays (performed on the same donor of PBMCs): methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP-seq) and methyl-binding protein (MBD-seq). In our analysis, we found that MeDIP-seq and MBD-seq are complementary strategies, with MeDIP-seq more sensitive to highly methylated, high-CpG densities and MDB-seq more sensitive to highly methylated, moderate-CpG densities. Taking into account the size of a mammalian genome and the current expense of sequencing, we feel 3Â gigabases (Gbp) 45Â bp paired-end MeDIP-seq or MBD-seq uniquely mapped reads is the minimum requirement and cost-effective strategy for methylome pattern analysis.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
Authors
Ning Li, Mingzhi Ye, Yingrui Li, Zhixiang Yan, Lee M. Butcher, Jihua Sun, Xu Han, Quan Chen, Xiuqing zhang, Jun Wang,