Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1083393 Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

ObjectiveIf individuals experience a response shift, scores on measures before and after a self-management intervention may not be comparable. This study evaluated whether persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience a response shift after participating in a self-management program. The second objective was to compare the Oort and Schmitt structural equation modeling (SEM) approaches.MethodsSecondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial comparing a home- and hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation program were used to assess response shift on a physical and mental health–measurement model measured using the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) over a 1-year period.ResultsThe Oort approach showed significant changes between the no response shift model and models removing invariance constraints for the residual of the CRQ dyspnea (χ2SBdiff = 7, df = 1) (uniform recalibration) and intercepts of the SGRQ activity (χ2SBdiff = 14, df = 1) and impact (χ2SBdiff = 10, df = 1) subscales (nonuniform recalibration). Change in factor means showed changes in the physical health factor, which was slightly lower in unadjusted (0.32) as compared with the response shift–adjusted model (0.40). The Schmitt procedure was not supportive of any response shift effect and showed a marginal change in random error over time.ConclusionsThis study showed that COPD patients experienced a response shift after participating in a self-management program, which resulted in an underestimation of change in physical health. These results suggest that the Oort procedure is more sensitive in detecting a response shift, and that a measurement of response shift is needed before results can be interpreted. Future comparisons with other methods and a control group are needed.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
, , , ,