Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1083521 | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2006 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Disparity in estimates of consultation prevalence arose from inaccuracy of: (1) recall in survey responders and (2) recording by general practitioners of specific problems and repeat consultations. Perceived importance of problem in a multiproblem contact and whether it leads to an outcome (e.g., prescription) may influence recording. Implications exist for service provision projections and research.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Kelvin Jordan, Clare Jinks, Peter Croft,