| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11004516 | Biological Psychology | 2018 | 39 Pages |
Abstract
In the current study, 65 out of 174 participants cheated on their own initiative in a trivia quiz. These self-initiated cheaters were compared to 68 participants who were explicitly requested to cheat. Skin conductance, heart rate, and respiration were found to detect concealed information related to cheating. No significant differences emerged between self-initiated and instructed cheaters, supported by Bayesian statistics showing substantial evidence for the null hypothesis. The data demonstrate that the validity of the CIT is not restricted to instructed deception. This finding is encouraging from an ecological validity perspective and may pave the way for further field implementation of memory detection.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
Linda Marjoleine Geven, Nathalie klein Selle, Gershon Ben-Shakhar, Merel Kindt, Bruno Verschuere,