Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
11019066 | The American Journal of Cardiology | 2018 | 28 Pages |
Abstract
There are differences in the incidence, pathophysiology, and long-term effects of hypertension between women and men. We assessed sex-specific benefit-risk tradeoffs of different blood pressure (BP) goals in patients enrolled in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) after propensity score matching those with standard therapy (systolic BP <140 mm Hg) to those with intensive therapy (systolic BP <120 mm Hg; nâ¯=â¯9,106). Cox regression was conducted to compare standard versus intensive therapy in women and men with the composite outcome of myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Women were generally healthier at baseline and had a lower cardiovascular risk. Men on intensive therapy had a lower risk of the composite outcome compared to those on standard therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.86, pâ¯=â¯0.001) while in women no differences between therapy groups were observed (HR 0.82 [0.60 to 1.12], pâ¯=â¯0.206). For safety outcomes, women and men had increased risk of related serious adverse events with intensive treatment (HR 1.52 [1.06 to 2.18], pâ¯=â¯0.023 and HR 2.07 [1.55 to2.77], p < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, our study demonstrated that women did not benefit from intensive compared to standard BP control. A potential explanation for this may be the lower baseline cardiovascular risk in women.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Roberto MD, Karolina MD, Chathuri PhD, Robbert MD, PhD, MPH,