| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11029091 | Journal of Clinical Virology | 2018 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
The extraction performance of both platforms was found to be similar for EDTA whole blood, BAL, and urine specimens. The total turn-around time for nucleic acid extraction was found to be longer with the EMAG® platform, whereas hands-on time was reduced.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Immunology and Microbiology
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Authors
Nora S. Harbusch, Michael Bozic, Petra M. Konrad, Michaela Winkler, Harald H. Kessler,