Influences of sampling volume and sample concentration on the analysis of atmospheric carbonyls by 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine cartridge

In this study, the analytical bias involved in the application of the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (2,4-DNPH)-coated cartridge sampling method was investigated for the analysis of five atmospheric carbonyl species (i.e., acetaldehyde, propionaldehyde, butyraldehyde, isovaleraldehyde, and valeraldehyde). In order to evaluate the potential bias of the sampling technique, a series of the laboratory experiments were conducted to cover a wide range of volumes (1–20 L) and concentration levels (approximately 100–2000 ppb in case of acetaldehyde). The results of these experiments were then evaluated in terms of the recovery rate (RR) for each carbonyl species. The detection properties of these carbonyls were clearly distinguished between light and heavy species in terms of RR and its relative standard error (R.S.E.). It also indicates that the studied analytical approach can yield the most reliable pattern for light carbonyls, especially acetaldehyde. When these experimental results were tested further by a two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA), the analysis based on the cartridge sampling method is affected more sensitively by the concentration levels of samples rather than the sampling volume.