Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1274926 International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2013 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Effect of acetaldehyde and acetic acid on the DEFC performance.•Pt3(SnO2)/C showed superior DEFC performance compared to Pt3Sn/C(alloy) electrocatalyst.•The superior performance is due to increased formation of acetic acid instead of acetaldehyde.•DEFC performance was not affected by the presence of acetic acid.•Acetaldehyde led to a decrease of DEFC performance and durability.

PtSnO2/C with Pt:SnO2 molar ratios of 9:1, 3:1 and 1:1 prepared by an alcohol-reduction process were evaluated as anodicelectrocatalysts for direct ethanol fuel cell (DEFC). Acetaldehyde, acetic acid and mixtures of them with ethanol were also tested as fuels. Single cell tests showed that PtSnO2/C electrocatalysts have a superior electrical performance for ethanol and acetaldehyde electro-oxidation when compared to commercial Pt3Sn/C(alloy) and Pt/C electrocatalysts. For all electrocatalysts, no electrical response was observed when acetic acid was used as a fuel. For ethanol electro-oxidation, the main product was acetaldehyde when Pt3Sn/C(alloy) and Pt/C electrocatalysts were employed. Besides, PtSnO2/C electrocatalysts led to the formation of acetic acid as the major product. CO2 was formed in small quantities for all electrocatalysts studied. A sharp drop in electrical performance was observed when using a mixture of ethanol and acetaldehyde as a fuel, however, the use of a mixture of ethanol and acetic acid as a fuel did not affect the DEFC performance.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemistry Electrochemistry
Authors
, , , ,