Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1278375 International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2012 12 Pages PDF
Abstract

Several approaches are usually applied for modelling the source of high pressure under-expanded jets, ranging from the computationally expensive resolution of the jet's shock structure to simple formulae (pseudo-source or notional nozzle approaches). However, the assumptions made in each approach introduce inaccuracies in the CFD calculations. The objective of this work was twofold; to compare and evaluate the performance of both selected notional nozzle approaches and turbulence models with experimental results of free-shear high momentum H2 round jets. The experimental data covered horizontal H2 releases issuing from small nozzles (0.25–1 mm diameter). Three two-equation turbulence models were chosen for the simulations, the popular standard k-ε, the Shear Stress Transport (SST) and the baseline (BSL) k-ω model together with five notional nozzle approaches. The numerical results were presented in a systematic way in order to make general conclusions on the performance of both the approaches and models.

► First systematic evaluation of notional nozzle approaches and turbulence models. ► Performance evaluation of 5 notional nozzle approaches for high pressure jets. ► Comparison of simulation results (including 3 turbulence models) with experiments. ► Comparison for the centreline mass fractions, flow velocities and spreading rates. ► Comparison of experimental data and numerical results also for centreline decay law.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemistry Electrochemistry
Authors
, , , ,