| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1336447 | Polyhedron | 2014 | 7 Pages |
Two ruthenium sensitizers TT-230 and TT-232 based on cyclopenta[2,1-b:3,4-b′]dithiophene (CDT) were tested in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) using a tri-iodide/iodide redox couple, and their performances compared to the benchmark Z907. Both dyes of general formula Ru(LL′)(NCS)2 feature the same 4,4′-dicarboxylic acid 2,2′-bipyridine moiety acting as the anchoring group (L) to attach the dye on the TiO2 surface, and two CDT subunits as ancillary groups (L′) either directly-linked (TT-230) or vinylene-linked (TT-232) to the bipyridine moiety. In comparison with TT-230, the π-extended conjugation in TT-232 caused significant redshift and broadening of the absorption bands. However, despite better light-harvesting properties, the DSSC device sensitized with TT-232 strikingly underperformed compared to TT-230 under same conditions (PCE = 3.2% and 6.1%, respectively). The use of co-adsorbent (CHENO) or surfactants did not help to improve the photovoltaic properties of TT-230, and resulted in a degradation of the overall efficiency of the cell.
Graphical abstractTwo ruthenium sensitizers TT-230 and TT-232 based on cyclopenta[2,1-b:3,4-b']dithiophene (CDT) were tested in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) using a tri-iodide/iodide redox couple, and their performances compared to the benchmark Z907. Both dyes of general formula Ru(LL′)(NCS)2 feature the same 4,4′-dicarboxylic acid 2,2′-bipyridine moiety acting as the anchoring group (L ) to attach the dye on the TiO2 surface, and two CDT subunits as ancillary groups (L′) either directly-linked (TT-230) or vinylene-linked (TT-232) to the bipyridine moiety. In comparison with TT-230, the π-extended conjugation in TT-232 caused significant redshift and broadening of the absorption bands. However, despite better light-harvesting properties, the DSSC device sensitized with TT-232 strikingly underperformed compared to TT-230 under same conditions (PCE = 3.2% and 6.1%, respectively). The use of co-adsorbent (CHENO) or surfactants did not help to improve the photovoltaic properties of TT-230, and resulted in a degradation of the overall efficiency of the cell.Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide
