Does higher voter turnout among the poor lead to more equal policy representation?

The belief that elected officials are most responsive to the opinions of the wealthiest members of society is often assumed but has only recently begun to be tested. This paper examines a common explanation for why this disparity in political representation occurs: wealthy citizens vote at much higher rates than citizens with low incomes. Utilizing variation across states in voter turnout levels among the rich and poor, there is little evidence that increased voting among citizens with low incomes improves representation of their political opinions in the Senate. These findings cast doubt on the proposition that increased voter turnout among the poor is an avenue for promoting greater political equality in the United States.

► U.S. Senators respond to the rich but not the poor in their roll call voting. ► Even when low income citizens vote at higher rates, unequal responsiveness remains. ► Increased voter turnout among the poor does not seem to enhance political equality.