Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1407749 Journal of Molecular Structure 2007 12 Pages PDF
Abstract

In our efforts to investigate the influences of different pendant aromatic groups and the spatial position of N donors in 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole-based ligands on the structures of their metal complexes, five structurally related ligands: 1-[3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl]benzene (L1), 1-[3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl]naphthalene (L2), 8-[3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl]quinoline (L3), 3-[3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl]pyridine (L4) and 4-[3-(2- pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl]pyridine (L5), have been used to react with AgClO4 to form five Ag(I) complexes, [Ag(L1)2](ClO4) (1), [Ag(L2)2](ClO4) (2), [Ag(L3)(HL3)](ClO4)2(CH3CN) (3), {[Ag(L4)](ClO4)}2 (4), and {[Ag(L5)](ClO4)}∞ (5). The structural differences of these complexes may be attributed to the coordination geometries or N donor position of the pendant aromatic groups in ligands L1–L5. Also, the result reveals that various intra- and/or inter-molecular weak interactions, such as π⋯π stacking, C–H⋯π and C–H⋯O H-bonding interactions, play important roles in the formation of 1–5, especially in the aspect of linking the multi-nuclear discrete subunits or low-dimensional entities into high-dimensional frameworks. Moreover, the coordination behaviors of ligands L1–L5 have been briefly evaluated by DFT calculations.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemistry Organic Chemistry
Authors
, , , , , , ,