Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1564868 Journal of Nuclear Materials 2015 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Lattice deformations of (U1−xGdx)O2.00 & (Th1−xGdx)O2−x/2 are not identical.•(U1−xGdx)O2.00 retains its fluorite structure.•(Th1−xGdx)O2−x/2 forms an excess-anion bixbyite structure.•(U1−xGdx)O2.00 and (Th1−xGdx)O2−x/2 contractions were evaluated with high precision.

The lattice deformations in two doped fluorite systems, (U1−xGdx)O2.00 and (Th1−xGdx)O2−x/2, have been reassessed by precise X-ray and electron diffraction investigations and the results were interpreted using the Bond Valence Sum (BVS) approach. For the (U1−xGdx)O2.00 system, the experimental findings and theoretical assessment confirm earlier work: the lattice keeps its fluorite structure with a unit cell parameter that contracts linearly with dopant concentration. The lattice contraction in the (Th1−xGdx)O2−x/2 system has for the first time been analyzed up to the solubility limit. Similar as for (U1−xGdx)O2.00, the (Th1−xGdx)O2−x/2 solid solution contracts linearly as a function of dopant concentration but additionally, it develops a superstructure which is closely related to the parent fluorite structure. An excess anion bixbyite trial model is proposed to describe this superstructure.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Energy Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Authors
, , , , , ,