| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1967705 | Clinica Chimica Acta | 2007 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Small biases in the calibration of analytical creatinine methods can lead to differences in clinical concordance using estimated GFR. Selecting an optimal POCT method depends on the institution's current creatinine method and tolerance for analytical performance and clinical concordance.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
Authors
James H. Nichols, Cathy Bartholomew, Arianna Bonzagi, Jane L. Garb, Long Jin,