Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1970840 | Clinical Biochemistry | 2011 | 6 Pages |
ObjectivesTo investigate the effect of extreme levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in the calculation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) using Friedewald's formula (FF) and other formulas proposed recently.Design and methodsLipoprotein profile was performed in 2603 samples with HDL-C ≤ 20 mg/dL and 1953 samples with HDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL.ResultsWilcoxon's and Student's t-tests showed significant differences (p < 0.001) between calculated LDL-C by different formulas and direct determination in the two groups of HDL-C values. Passing–Bablok regression and Bland–Altman plot showed disagreement for the four formulas studied, except for Vujovic formula in the HLD-C ≥ 100 mg/dL group.ConclusionsOur results suggested that none of the formulas under analysis should be used for estimating LDL-C in samples with extreme HDL-C concentrations due to absence of statistical correlation with LDL-C direct measurement.
► Friedewald Formula is the most usual approach in clinical routine to calculate LDL-C. ► Different limitations of FF have been reported. ► We evaluated the effect of extreme low or high HDL-C levels on LDL-C estimation. ► Estimation formulas should not be used to calculate LDL-C with extreme HDL-C levels.