Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
236502 | Powder Technology | 2014 | 12 Pages |
•Globally Eulerian Locally Lagrangian (GELL) discretization technique was used.•GELL for Lagrangian Concentration Differential Equation (LCDE) was introduced.•LCDE was compared with other methods to test accuracy in different flow-fields.•LCDE and area methods need good trajectory computation for good accuracy.•Other bin methods need high number of particles to remain accurate.
For gas flows, a Lagrangian Concentration Differential Equation (LCDE) was solved along a particle path using Eulerian derivatives for the particle velocity divergence field. This equation is solved by a Globally Eulerian Locally Lagrangian (GELL) discretization technique which avoids the computationally intensive Jacobian calculations of the Full Lagrangian method, the steady-state assumption of the area method, and the computational inefficiency of the box-counting methods. The LCDE–GELL method was compared to such methods using a high-order temporal integration technique and evaluated for two fundamental flowfields: flow past a corner and past a cylinder. In the dilute limit, the particle concentration fields were predicted for various particle inertias (characterized by a range of Stokes numbers) including the zero-mass (tracer) limit for which an exact particle concentration solution exists. Both the weighted-average and ensemble-average methods required far more parcels to achieve the same accuracy demonstrated by the LCDE–GELL method. It is recommended that future work investigates the LCDE approach for three-dimensional, complex flows with particle–particle interaction to investigate its robustness.
Graphical abstractTrajectory and Normalized concentration with Δy/D = 0.05, Np = 50 at x/D = 1.5 at t = 0.01 for St = 0.Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide