Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2486504 | Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences | 2010 | 17 Pages |
Abstract
This study evaluated the utility of oral sulfasalazine as a probe substrate for Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP; ABCG2) activity by assessing the impact of genetic variation or coadministration of an inhibitor (pantoprazole) on plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of sulfasalazine and metabolites. Thirty-six healthy male subjects prescreened for ABCG2 421CC (reference activity), CA, and AA (lower activity) genotypes (Nâ=â12 each) received a single 500âmg oral dose of enteric coated sulfasalazine alone, with 40âmg pantoprazole, or with 40âmg famotidine (gastrointestinal pH control) in a 3-period, single fixed sequence, crossover design. No significant difference in sulfasalazine or metabolite pharmacokinetics in 421AA or CA compared to 421CC subjects was found; however, high inter-subject variability was observed. Geometric mean (95% CI) sulfasalazine plasma AUC(0-â) values were 32.1 (13.2, 78.1), 16.8 (7.15, 39.6) and 62.7 (33.4, 118) µgâh/mL, and Cmax were 4.01 (1.62, 9.92), 1.70 (0.66, 4.40), and 6.86 (3.61, 13.0) µg/mL for CC, CA, and AA subjects, respectively. Pantoprazole and famotidine did not affect sulfasalazine pharmacokinetics in any genotypic cohort. These results suggest that the pharmacokinetics of oral, enteric-coated 500âmg sulfasalazine are not sufficiently sensitive to ABCG2 genetic variation or inhibitors to be useful as a clinical probe substrate of BCRP activity. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 99:1046-1062, 2010
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
Drug Discovery
Authors
Kimberly K. Adkison, Soniya S. Vaidya, Daniel Y. Lee, Seok Hwee Koo, Linghui Li, Amar A. Mehta, Annette S. Gross, Joseph W. Polli, Joan E. Humphreys, Yu Lou, Edmund J.D. Lee,