Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2579077 | Thérapie | 2012 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Two studies led in parallel from May till June, 2009, were proposed in Alsace in order to analyze the hospital practices of prescription relative to 6 drugs charged in addition to the GHS: bevacizumab, gemcitabine, trastuzumab, etanercept, adalimumab and infliximab. The first study, led within 9 hospitals, allowed the collection of 343 situations of prescription. The second approach, based on the extraction of the PMSI data from the same hospitals, allowed the exploitation of 771 situations of prescription. The data collected on sites and from the PMSI respectively put in evidence 86.3% and 73.0% of prescriptions corresponding to guidelines. No unacceptable situation was revealed. The differences between approaches can be explained by the important proportion of unclassifiable situations extracted from the PMSI. These approaches bring complementary lightings and allow the OMEDIT of Alsace to take position in its missions of expertise and follow-up of therapeutic innovations.
Keywords
MCOInstitut national du cancerGHMAMMAFSSAPSGHSPMSIANSMRSAINCAARSPTTDAST2AAgence régionale de santéAgence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santéAgence Nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santéTherapeutic useprogramme de médicalisation des systèmes d’informationPratique professionnelleProfessional practicetumor necrosis factor alphaPharmacie à usage intérieurAntineoplastic drugsAnti-TNFAnti-Tumor Necrosis FactorArcTarification à l’activitéautorisation de mise sur le marchéPUIgroupes homogènes de malades
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (General)
Authors
Géraldine Kuss, Nicole Drogue, Bruno Michel,