Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
26891 | Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry | 2013 | 8 Pages |
•C-doped titanate nanotubes (TNT) are formed through hydrothermal treatment of C-doped TiO2 nanoparticles.•The technique is not applicable to the formation of W-doped nanotubes.•C-Doped nanotubes absorb into the visible region of the spectrum.•TNT materials are more active visible light photocatalysts than their nanoparticulate precursors, and doped materials are more active than non-doped analogues.•Improved TNT photoactivity is not reflected in improved photocurrent measurements, reflecting the fact that the nanotubes are disordered.
Carbon-doped titanate nanotubes (C-TNT) were formed via alkaline hydrothermal treatment of a TiO2 nanoparticulate material pre-doped with carbon. Attempts to form C and W co-doped titanate nanotubes using analogous C and W co-doped nanoparticulate materials were unsuccessful. Physical characterisations, such as X-ray diffraction, N2 physisorption and transmission electron microscopy, confirmed the formation of titanate nanotubes ∼7 nm in diameter and hundreds of nm in length with increased surface areas relative to the nanoparticulate precursors. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirmed the retention of substitutional carbon dopant and the exclusion of tungsten dopant from the doped TNT materials.Converting doped (or undoped TiO2) into C-TNT (or TNT) slightly increases the material's bandgap but the C-TNT material (in contrast to TNT and undoped TiO2) absorbs into the visible region of the spectrum. C-doped and un-doped titanate nanotube materials were more active in promoting the photo degradation of 4-chlorophenol under visible light than their analogous nanoparticulate precursors. C-TNT was the most photocatalytically active material tested.However, photocurrent response measurements showed C-TNT to be less effective at generating current following irradiation than both its nanoparticulate analogue and nanoparticulate P25 when screen printed onto electrode surfaces. We ascribe this to non-optimal alignment of the TNTs on the electrode surface.
Graphical abstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide