Safety and efficacy of overlapping sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents

BackgroundThe short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of paclitaxel versus sirolimus-overlapping drug-eluting stents (DES) is unknown. We sought to examine the clinical consequences of overlapping sirolimus versus paclitaxel DES.MethodsWe reviewed catheterization reports from April 2003 to May 2005 for all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary revascularization with DES. All patients were followed-up for at least 1 year. Patients were included if they received only 2 single-type overlapping stent (eg, sirolimus-sirolimus) during the index procedure. The end points included early (inhospital and 30-day) and late composite of all-cause mortality, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.ResultsA total of 282 individuals met our study criteria. Of these, 188 had sirolimus and 94 had paclitaxel-overlapping DES. There were 78 events for a median follow-up of 24 months for the composite end point. No statistically significant differences between overlapping sirolimus and paclitaxel DES were seen for inhospital, 30-day (16% vs 23%, respectively; P = .13), and long-term (25% vs 33%, respectively; P = .16) composite end points. In addition, in Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analysis, no significant differences for the composite end point were noted.ConclusionsIn this analysis, there were no significant differences in safety or efficacy between the 2 types of overlapping DES. Trends toward more events with overlapping paclitaxel stents should be evaluated in an adequately powered randomized controlled trial.