Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2858227 The American Journal of Cardiology 2009 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

Left ventricular activation delay (LVAT) >100 ms may determine response to cardiac resynchronization therapy, but its prevalence and relation to QRS configuration are unknown. QRS duration and LVAT in control subjects (n = 30) were compared with those in patients with heart failure (HF; LV ejection fraction 23 ± 8%, n = 120) with a QRS duration <120 ms (NQRSHF, n = 35) or ≥120 ms (left bundle branch block [LBBBHF], n = 54; right bundle branch block [RBBBHF], n = 31). LVAT was estimated by interval from QRS onset to basal inferolateral LV depolarization. In controls, QRS duration was 82 ± 13 ms and LVAT was 55 ± 18 ms. LVAT was always <100 ms. In patients with NQRSHF, QRS duration (104 ± 10 ms) and LVAT (82 ± 22 ms) were prolonged versus controls (p <0.001). LVAT exceeded 100 ms in 8 of 35 patients. In patients with LBBBHF, QRS duration (161 ± 29 ms) and LVAT (136 ± 33 ms) were prolonged compared with controls and patients with NQRSHF (p <0.001). LVAT exceeded 100 ms in 47 of 54 patients. In patients with RBBBHF, QRS duration did not differ from that in patients with LBBBHF, but LVAT (100 ± 24 ms) was shorter (p <0.001). In 17 of 31 patients with RBBBHF LVAT was <100 ms (82 ± 12), similar to those with NQRSHF (p = NS), indicating no LV conduction delay. However, in 7 of 31, LVAT (135 ± 13 ms) was similar to that in patients with LBBBHF (p = NS). LVAT correlation with QRS duration varied (control p = 0.004, NQRSHF p = 0.15, RBBBHF p = 0.01, LBBBHF p <0.001). In conclusion, LV conduction delays in patients with HF varied with QRS configuration and duration, exceeding 100 ms in only 23% of patients with narrow QRS configuration and 45% with RBBBHF compared with 87% with LBBBHF. Fewer than 25% of patients with RBBBHF demonstrated delays equivalent to those in patients with LBBBHF. These variations may affect efficacy to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
,