| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2861654 | The American Journal of Cardiology | 2007 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
The customary interpretation of active-controlled noninferiority trials is founded on a number of unverifiable assumptions. These assumptions can be circumvented, and the semantic and statistic interpretation of the trials placed on a more rational foundation, if treatment comparisons are analyzed from a Bayesian perspective. In conclusion, the resultant probabilistic measures thereby render the meaning of noninferiority more transparent and clinically relevant.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
George A. Diamond, Sanjay Kaul,