Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2949540 Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2011 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) during elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).BackgroundStudies have documented that GPIs are useful during PCI; however, much of this research was conducted before the routine use of coronary stents and thienopyridines.MethodsWe searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane clinical trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception for studies that randomly assigned patients undergoing elective PCI to a GPI versus control. Trials were included if stents and thienopyridines were used routinely and clinical outcomes were reported. Outcomes were assessed within 30 days. A DerSimonian-Laird model was used to construct random effects summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsOur search yielded 22 studies with 10,123 patients. The incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction was 5.1% with GPI versus 8.3% with control (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.79, p < 0.0001). Major bleeding was 1.2% versus 0.9% (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.83 to 2.25, p = 0.22), minor bleeding was 3.0% versus 1.7% (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.28 to 2.26, p < 0.0001), and mortality was 0.3% versus 0.5% (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.36 to 1.33, p = 0.27), respectively.ConclusionsIn the current era of elective PCI performed with stents and thienopyridines, GPIs provide clinical benefit. These agents reduce nonfatal myocardial infarction without a notable increase in major bleeding; however, they increase the risk of minor bleeding. All-cause mortality is not reduced.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
, , , , , ,