Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2952802 Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2008 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

ObjectivesThis study was designed to evaluate the long-term cardiovascular benefit of bezafibrate therapy in coronary heart disease patients enrolled in the BIP (Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention) trial.BackgroundThe BIP trial yielded a nonsignificant 7.3% reduction in the rate of major cardiac events after a mean follow-up period of 6.2 years, possibly owing to an increasing unbalanced usage of nonstudy lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs) during the course of the trial.MethodsThe adjusted risk for the combined end point of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction during an extended mean 8.2-year follow-up period of the BIP trial was assessed in 3,090 patients allocated to the original bezafibrate (n = 1,548) and placebo (n = 1,542) groups of the trial.ResultsDuring the extended follow-up period, nonstudy LLDs were administered to a significantly greater proportion of placebo-allocated patients (57%) than bezafibrate-allocated patients (53%; p = 0.02). Interaction-term analysis demonstrated that the benefit of bezafibrate therapy was pronounced (18% risk reduction; p = 0.03) without or before treatment with nonstudy LLDs initiated during follow-up and attenuated (hazard ratio 1.05; p = 0.85) after therapy with nonstudy LLDs initiated during the observation period. Consistent with these findings, treatment with bezafibrate was shown to be associated with a significant 17% risk reduction (p = 0.03) when study patients were censored from the analysis upon initiation of therapy with nonstudy LLDs.ConclusionsThe data demonstrate that bezafibrate therapy in the BIP trial was associated with significant long-term cardiovascular protection that was attenuated by an unbalanced usage of nonstudy LLDs during the course of the trial.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
, , ,