Electrocardiographic predictors of culprit artery in acute inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction

BackgroundIn acute inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), multiple electrocardiographic algorithms have been proposed to predict the culprit artery. Our purpose is to review these and compare them to ST depression in lead aVR to predict culprit artery in inferior STEMI.MethodsIn 106 patients with acute inferior STEMI who underwent emergent coronary angiography, we correlated electrocardiographic and angiographic findings pertaining to the culprit artery. We then reviewed the algorithms proposed by Fiol et al and Tierala et al, and applied them and our own from Kanei et al using ST depression in aVR for predicting the left circumflex artery (LCx) as the culprit, to the population. Finally, we compared the sensitivities and specificities of the respective algorithms for predicting the culprit artery.ResultsThe sensitivity and specificity of ST depression in lead aVR to predict LCx as the culprit were 53% and 86%, respectively, and 86% and 55%, respectively for predicting the right coronary artery (RCA) as the culprit. When their algorithms were applied to our population, the sensitivities and specificities of Fiol et al and Tierala et al were slightly higher.ConclusionCompared to other proposed algorithms, ST depression in aVR is a simple method with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity to predict the culprit artery in inferior STEMI.