Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3018771 | Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) | 2008 | 14 Pages |
Introduction and objectivesTo investigate the clinical characteristics and treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), and to determine the effects of an early invasive strategy (EIS) in non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTEACS) and of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation ACS (STEACS).MethodsData were collected prospectively for 9 months during 2004-2005 from 50 hospitals, which were randomly selected according to the level of care provided. In addition, follow-up data on mortality and readmission for ACS were collected for 6 months. The adjusted effects of different reperfusion strategies were analyzed.ResultsAfter checking data quality, the analysis included data from 32 hospitals, which covered 7923 coronary events (4431 [56%] STEACS, 3034 [38%] NSTEACS, and 458 [6%] unclassified ACS) in 7251 patients. Compared with previous studies, the use of primary PCI in STEACS had increased markedly (from 10.7% to 36.8% of patients undergoing reperfusion), as had the use of EIS in NSTEACS (from 11.1% to 19.6%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1-6.2); for STEACS it was 7.6% (95% CI, 6.7-8.7), for NSTEACS 3.9% (95% CI, 3.3-4.6), and for unclassified ACS 8.8% (95% CI, 6.2-12.2). In the population as a whole, there was no association between prognosis (ie, 6-month mortality) and EIS in NSTEACS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.94; 95% CI, 0.66-1.3) or between prognosis and primary PCI in STEACS (HR=1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.5). Findings for mortality and rehospitalization for ACS at 6 months were similar.ConclusionsData for 2004-2005 demonstrated a marked increase in the use of invasive procedures. However, the procedures employed were poorly matched to the patients' baseline risk.
Introducción y objetivosDeterminar el perfil clínico, el manejo del síndrome coronario agudo (SCA) y el efecto de la estrategia intervencionista precoz (EIP) en el SCA sin elevación del ST (SCASEST) y del intervencionismo coronario percutáneo (ICP) primario en el SCA con elevación del ST (SCACEST).MétodosInclusión prospectiva en 50 hospitales seleccionados aleatoriamente según nivel asistencial, durante 9 meses entre 2004 y 2005, y seguimiento a 6 meses de la mortalidad o el reingreso por SCA. Se analizó el efecto ajustado de las estrategias de reperfusión.ResultadosTras control de calidad, se analizaron los datos de 32 hospitales, correspondientes a 7.923 acontecimientos coronarios (4.431 SCASEST [56%], 3.034 SCACEST [38%] y 458 SCA inclasificable [6%]) de 7.251 pacientes. Respecto a registros anteriores, destaca un incremento del ICP primario en el SCACEST (del 10,7 al 36,8% de los reperfundidos) y la EIP en el SCASEST (del 11,1 al 19,6%). La mortalidad hospitalaria total fue del 5,7% (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 5,1%-6,2%); del SCACEST, el 7,6% (IC del 95%, 6,7%-8,7%); del SCASEST, el 3,9% (IC del 95%, 3,3%-4,6%), y del indeterminado, el 8,8% (IC del 95%, 6,2%-12,2%). No se observó, en el total de la población, relación con el pronóstico (mortalidad a 6 meses) de la EIP en el SCASEST (hazard ratio [HR] = 0,94; IC del 95%, 0,66-1,3) ni del ICP primario en el SCACEST (HR = 1; IC del 95%, 0,7-1,5). Se observaron resultados similares con la variable muerte o reingreso por SCA a 6 meses.ConclusionesEn 2004-2005 se registró en España un aumento de estrategias invasivas. Se observó una insuficiente adecuación de éstas al riesgo basal de los pacientes.