| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 331401 | New Ideas in Psychology | 2016 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The scientist-practitioner-model is rejected, based on an earlier critique of the current paradigm for psychological research. Ten cases exemplifying a bricoleur type of practice without a discernible empirical evidence-base are briefly presented. In the absence of useful empirical scientific evidence, the bricoleur model is proposed as a possible rationale for professional psychological practice.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Psychology
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Authors
Jan Smedslund,