| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3418931 | Revista Iberoamericana de Micología | 2013 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
Azole derivatives showed a similar antifungal profile, being more active against anthropophilic dermatophytes > zoophilic > geophilic. Activity of TRB and AMR was different from that of azole derivatives (zoophilic > anthropophilic > geophilic). A higher in vitro antifungal activity against the 3 ecological groups was observed with TRB and AMR, whilst BFZ was the less active drug.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Immunology and Microbiology
Microbiology
Authors
Alfonso Javier Carrillo-Muñoz, Cristina Tur-Tur, Delia Cárdenes, Florencia Rojas, Gustavo Giusiano,