Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
350843 | Computers in Human Behavior | 2013 | 4 Pages |
•We compared attitude moderation following online and offline conversations.•Participants were matched to agreeing or disagreeing conversation partners.•Dyads were compared using the actor–partner interdependence model.•Face-to-face dyad members grew closer in attitudes following conversation.•Online dyad members did not alter attitudes following conversation.
Face-to-face conversation and online chat were compared on their tendency to moderate attitudes through exposure to an opposing perspective. As predicted on the basis of the greater self-focus and reduced presence of the other in text-based chat, strangers who chatted online for 20 min about a divisive social issue on which they held opposing attitudes showed less movement toward their partner’s position as a result than did those who spoke face-to-face for the same length of time. The potential limitation of text-based online communication for bridging attitude divides is discussed.