Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
354400 | Economics of Education Review | 2012 | 14 Pages |
An extensive literature exploring a range of peer influences on both academic and non-academic outcomes continues to produce contradictory evidence regarding the existence and magnitude of peer effects. Our results provide no evidence of peer effects in models where peer academic ability is measured in the aggregate. However, models that control for own-gender and other gender peer performance identify strong, positive, and statistically significant male peer influence on male students. In contrast, females are unresponsive to either male or female peer average academic rating. The results highlight the possibility that significant own gendered effects for males may be masked by insignificant effects in the aggregate.
► We estimate section level course fixed effects models to address endogenous peer group sorting. ► We separately consider own and other gender peer academic quality effects on student grade outcomes. ► We find that male peer academic quality positively and significantly influences male but not female course GPA. ► We find that female peer academic quality has no statistically significant effect on either male or female course GPA.