Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
364660 Learning and Individual Differences 2015 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Path analyses are used to examine the factors that predict numeracy performance.•Gender, age, educational background, maths anxiety and maths attitudes are explored.•Maths anxiety is the strongest affective predictor of numeracy performance.•Educational background is the strongest non-affective predictor of numeracy.•Significant differences in the patterns of results between university disciplines.

Psychology, nursing and medicine are undergraduate degrees that require students to attain a level of numerical competence for graduation. Yet, the numeracy aspect of these courses is often actively disliked and poorly performed. This study's aim was to identify what factors most strongly predict performance in such courses. Three hundred and twenty-five undergraduate students from these three disciplines were given measures of numeracy performance, maths anxiety, maths attitudes and various demographic and educational variables. From these data three separate path analysis models were formed, showing the predictive effects of affective, demographic and educational variables on numeracy performance. Maths anxiety was the strongest affective predictor for psychology and nursing students, with motivation being more important for medical students. Across participant groups, pre-university maths qualifications were the strongest demographic/educational predictor of performance. The results can be used to suggest ways to improve performance in students having difficulty with numeracy-based modules.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Psychology Developmental and Educational Psychology
Authors
, , , ,