Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
383684 Expert Systems with Applications 2012 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

Many techniques have been proposed for credit risk assessment, from statistical models to artificial intelligence methods. During the last few years, different approaches to classifier ensembles have successfully been applied to credit scoring problems, demonstrating to be more accurate than single prediction models. However, it is still a question what base classifiers should be employed in each ensemble in order to achieve the highest performance. Accordingly, the present paper evaluates the performance of seven individual prediction techniques when used as members of five different ensemble methods. The ultimate aim of this study is to suggest appropriate classifiers for each ensemble approach in the context of credit scoring. The experimental results and statistical tests show that the C4.5 decision tree constitutes the best solution for most ensemble methods, closely followed by the multilayer perceptron neural network and logistic regression, whereas the nearest neighbour and the naive Bayes classifiers appear to be significantly the worst.

► Evaluation of base classifiers with respect to ensembles in credit scoring. ► The best models are decision tree, multilayer perceptron and logistic regression. ► Nearest neighbour and naive Bayes are the worst models, independently of the ensemble.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Computer Science Artificial Intelligence
Authors
, , ,