Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
430921 Journal of Discrete Algorithms 2012 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

Denote by kt(G)kt(G) the number of cliques of order t in a graph G having n   vertices. Let kt(n)=min{kt(G)+kt(G¯)} where G¯ denotes the complement of G  . Let ct(n)=kt(n)/(nt) and ctct be the limit of ct(n)ct(n) for n   going to infinity. A 1962 conjecture of Erdős stating that ct=21−(t2) was disproved by Thomason in 1989 for all t⩾4t⩾4. Tighter counterexamples have been constructed by Jagger, Šťovíček and Thomason in 1996, by Thomason for t⩽6t⩽6 in 1997, and by Franek for t=6t=6 in 2002. We investigate a computational framework to search for tighter upper bounds for small t   and provide the following improved upper bounds for t=6,7t=6,7 and 8: c6⩽0.7445×21−(62), c7⩽0.6869×21−(72), and c8⩽0.7002×21−(82). The constructions are based on a large but highly regular variant of Cayley graphs for which the number of cliques and cocliques can be expressed in closed form. Note that if we consider the quantity et=2(t2)−1ct, the new upper bound of 0.687 for e7e7 is the first bound for any etet smaller than the lower bound of 0.695 for e4e4 due to Giraud in 1979.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Computer Science Computational Theory and Mathematics
Authors
, , ,