Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
435184 Theoretical Computer Science 2016 5 Pages PDF
Abstract

•We improve the known results and get that χΣ″(G)≤max⁡{Δ(G)+2,14}.•The bound Δ(G)+2Δ(G)+2 is sharp.•The proof uses the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz, color-changing and discharging method.

Let G=(V(G),E(G))G=(V(G),E(G)) be a graph and ϕ be a proper total k-coloring of G  . Let f(v)f(v) denote the sum of the color on a vertex v and colors on all the edges incident with v. ϕ is neighbor sum distinguishing   if f(u)≠f(v)f(u)≠f(v) for each edge uv∈E(G)uv∈E(G). The smallest integer k for which such a coloring of G exists is the neighbor sum distinguishing total chromatic number   and denoted by χΣ″(G). Pilśniak and Woźniak conjectured that for any simple graph with maximum degree Δ(G)Δ(G), χΣ″(G)≤Δ(G)+3. It is known that for any simple planar graph, χΣ″(G)≤max⁡{Δ(G)+3,14} and χΣ″(G)≤max⁡{Δ(G)+2,16}. In this paper, by using the famous Combinatorial Nullstellensatz, we show that for any simple planar graph, χΣ″(G)≤max⁡{Δ(G)+2,14}. The bound Δ(G)+2Δ(G)+2 is sharp.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Computer Science Computational Theory and Mathematics
Authors
, , , ,